Worth Sharing ...

From today (9/6/05) onward, we would like to share with you not only constraint to news but included jokes, games, technology, music, movie, fashion, food and etc that we consider worth to share here. Enjoy your stay! ;)

Thursday, April 27, 2006

20 YEARS SINCE CHERNOBYL

Ukrainians hope to return life to region


By NATASHA LISOVA
Associated Press

CHERNOBYL, Ukraine — The concrete-and-steel sarcophagus hastily built to entomb reactor No. 4 at the Chernobyl nuclear plant is crumbling and dotted with holes. Birds have found their way inside, and radiation has escaped.

The $1.1 billion project to replace the sarcophagus remains on the drawing board, 20 years after the explosion and fire that spewed radiation across much of Europe. A storage shelter for used fuel from Chernobyl's other reactors also has yet to be built.

But international experts say radiation levels are decreasing a hundredfold in some areas around the shuttered plant. And the United Nations says it is time to transform the population from victims into survivors.

Arriving by helicopter at the shuttered Chernobyl nuclear power plant Wednesday for commemorations of the catastrophe's 20th anniversary, Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko said his government supports change.

"Chernobyl must not be a mourning place, it must become a place of hope," Yushchenko said after laying two red carnations beneath a monument to the victims in the explosion.

Yushchenko has called for studies to determine how the land could be used, and has floated the possibility of everything from tourism to a storage site for used nuclear fuel to a nature preserve. The area, largely bereft of humans, has become a wildlife preserve of sorts with the reappearance of species that hadn't been seen for decades.

"I see nothing wrong if in Kiev there will emerge a couple of tour excursion companies," the president told state television in an interview. "To see Chernobyl villages with their open windows, unlocked doors and overgrown gardens are also lessons, and some people can be more impressed by that than the destroyed reactor."

Thirty-one people died within the first two months from illnesses caused by radioactivity, but there is heated debate over the toll that will be taken over the years.

A report from the U.N. health agency estimated last week that about 9,300 people will die from cancers caused by Chernobyl's radiation. Some groups, such as Greenpeace, insist the toll could be 10 times higher.

Some 5 million people live in areas where radioactive particles fell in Ukraine, Belarus and Russia, and a U.N. report last year found that many suffer from a deep sense of gloom about the future.

The shattered reactor, which spewed out radioactivity for 10 days, contaminated 77,220 square miles and forced the Soviet government to permanently evacuate more than 300,000 people.

"The environment does cleanse itself," said Igor Linge, a Russian atomic energy expert at a conference in Kiev, the Ukrainian capital. "But there are some areas, of course, that will remain contaminated for hundreds of years, maybe even thousands. It is a geological process and happens on a geological time scale."

Chernobyl's emotional wounds remain raw.

There is intense disagreement over the health, environmental and social tolls two decades after one of the plant's reactors exploded during a test on April 26, 1986, sending radioactive clouds over the western Soviet Union and northern Europe.

Bringing red carnations and flickering candles to Chernobyl memorials around the country, Ukrainians repeated a common mantra: It can't be allowed to happen again.

"Let God not make our grandsons relive this," Valentyna Mashina, 55, said at a memorial in Chernobyl, a town 11 miles from the plant where 4,000 people still live — but for no more than two weeks at a time, to work in the most highly contaminated zone.

Critics contend the damage from Chernobyl is being played down to restore faith in atomic energy at a time when the world is hunting for alternatives to oil.

But Yushchenko urged that nuclear energy not be feared.

The Ukrainian leader has expressed interest in nuclear energy as a way to reduce his country's dependence on its former master, Russia, for natural gas supplies. The priority, he told state television, has to be prolonging the 15 reactors that Ukraine already has.

"It sounds paradoxical, but nuclear energy is the world's safest," Yushchenko said. He added, however, that it was too early to talk about new reactors in Ukraine.

Anna Golubovska-Onisimova, head of the Ukrainian environmental group MAMA-86, said at an environmental conference held to coincide with the anniversary that environmentalists would aggressively fight plans for new reactors.

"Ukraine doesn't need nuclear reactors. Hasn't Chernobyl taught us anything?" she asked.

Environmentalists say Ukraine should focus instead on energy-saving technologies.

They argue the country's vast farm lands should be used to produce biofuels — something Yushchenko suggested could be done on land around Chernobyl. Ukraine could also use its wind resources, particularly in the Crimea, to harness natural energy, environmentalists say.

———

Associated Press writers Anna Melnichuk and Mara D. Bellaby contributed to this report.


Mandarin Version:
http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2006-04/27/content_4481483.htm

Thursday, April 20, 2006

Chu-Han Contention

The Chu-Han contention (楚漢相爭 or 楚漢春秋, 206–202 BC) was a post-Qin Dynasty interregnum period in China. During this period the rebel kings derived from the collapse of Qin Dynasty formed two camps fighting each other. One camp was headed by Liu Bang (劉邦), King of Han while the other was headed by Xiang Yu (項羽), King Ba of Chu. Several minor kings also fought independent wars against each other during that period. The war ended with total victory of Liu Bang, who claimed himself the emperor and established the Han Dynasty.

Origin of the War
In 221 BC, the Qin Dynasty annexed all the other states in China to form the first united Chinese Empire. However, the political unification did not immediately result in a unified national identity of all Chinese people. In some former state territory, sympathy to the old state still prevailed. This might not be a huge problem had the Qin Dynasty been able to consolidate its rule over all China for a long period of time. However, Qin's rule was extremely unpopular and unbearable to most Chinese people. Insurrection followed and the Qin Dynasty collapsed within 30 years of the unification. During the collapse of Qin, many rebels rallied local people to their support under the banners of the old states. The result was that, when the Qin Dynasty ended, China was divided into many kingdoms, many with the old Warring State kingdom name and with a relative of the old royal family in throne.


At that moment, the future of China was not clear. Some people, especially many descendants of the old ruling families of the old kingdoms thought the Warring States would be restored and China would be divided again among these kingdoms. However, most of the common people were tired of the endless war and hoped a united empire could end it.

Among these kingdoms, the strongest was Chu. Xiang Yu, the chief of Chu army, won the support of most of the kings following his heroic Julu Campaign (鉅鹿之戰) and became the de facto leader of all the kings, although the throne of Chu was still in the hands of the figurehead King Huai of Chu. In 206 BC, it was obvious that the fate of China lay in his hands. However, although a brilliant military leader, Xiang Yu was incompetent in politics. Being placed in a position to create a post-Qin order of China, he made several unwise moves:

*First, after the bulk of the Qin army (around 200,000 soldiers) surrendered to him, Xiang Yu ruthlessly slaughtered them all. Most of them were from the Qin homeland, Guanzhong (關中). By doing this, Xiang Yu won the hatred of the people of Guanzhong, who later would remain loyal to Liu Bang in the following war.

*Second, Xiang Yu murdered Emperor Yi of Chu, the nominal leader of all the rebel kings. By doing so, Xiang Yu was considered by many as having committed regicide. This gave many people an excuse to turn against him.

*Third, Xiang Yu severely underestimated the danger of Liu Bang. Although he had the chance to get rid of Liu Bang for good, Xiang Yu let it pass.

*Fourth, Xiang Yu realigned many kingdoms to reward his favorites, a move which angered many others. Several disgruntled kingdoms soon rebelled against him. Those who were rewarded were also too busy consolidating their own rule to support Xiang Yu in the following war.


The last reason was the direct cause of Chu-Han Contention. It all started with the Qi rebellion.